Professor Edward Zelinsky, a distinguished tax law expert at Cardozo Law School and author of The Origins of the Ownership Society, has a thoughtful and provocative Oxford University Press piece on Albert Pujols and his 10-year, $254 million contract. Zelinsky argues that Pujols indeed deserves what he is being paid and that he is not under-taxed. Here is an excerpt:

Pujols is not a poorly-performing CEO whose salary has been inflated by a compliant compensation consultant and ratified by a passive board of directors the CEO himself has selected. Pujols’ salary was established in a transparent and open marketplace by purchasers seeking his services on an arms-length basis against other bidders, baseball teams trying to win more games. Pujols has earned the rewards of the marketplace in a truly competitive fashion.

Pujols joined the proverbial 1% honorably, through hard work and professional success. I suspect that many of the folks who identify with Occupy Wall Street will disagree, but Pujols should not be lumped together with overpaid, underperforming CEOs – of which there are many.

 To read the rest, click here.  It’s a good read.

Resources: Sports Law Blog

Related posts:

1. Zelinsky on The Supreme Court (of Baseball) Aaron Zelinsky, who has blogged here and written on aspects...
2. Professor Edward Zelinsky on Tax Considerations and Cliff Lee’s deal with the Phillies Professor Edward Zelinsky, a distinguished tax law expert at Cardozo...
3. Occupy Wall Street is Like the Tea Party???? Robert Knight had a great article in the Washington Times...
4. Occupy junk mail, or: How to keep Wall Street occupied Here’s an interesting idea on how to combine two...
5. Support the Occupy Wall Street Protest Movement? Supporters say “We are the 99%,” but critics say the...